Showing posts with label leadership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label leadership. Show all posts

21 December 2013

Flash Mob? Flash in the pan

Originally written on 9 December...

One of the Air Force bands executed a flash mob at the National Air and Space Museum recently.

While it's nice to see the USAF embracing 21st century concepts and technology, and actually working positive press for themselves for a change...I would prefer to see this combined with greater institutional depth to our care of people.

As a counterpoint, if Congress does nothing, military incentive pays for all branches stop on 1 January.  For an RPA pilot, major, with 14 years in, flight pay (and incentive pay he will lose) is 8% of his take home pay. 

Where's the press on how the government is hamstringing military personnel who are at war?  A friend mentioned the loss of flight pay to me, and it took some heavy searching to find the article at Stars and Stripes linked below.  Merry Christmas.


"Special pays would be first casualty of delayed defense bill" By J. Taylor Rushing, Stars and Stripes

 Update 21 Dec:

Of course this issue has now been resolved.  Congress has passed a budget, averting the loss of incentive pay mentioned above...but including a large cut to pensions.

More links on the topic:

29 August 2012

Fair winds...


Letter I sent at work recently...

-----Original Message-----
From: Witt, David
Sent: August 28, 2012
To:
Subject: Fair winds...

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I recently filed for separation from active duty, I will be out next spring. 

I've been planning on writing this letter for a while, and initially I planned it as a long rant listing all of my various grievances against the service, but ultimately decided that isn't what I wanted to spend anyone's time on.

For those of you I've talked with regularly, this is probably not a surprise, and for those of you I haven't, I doubt I have anything that original to rant about, so I don't see a need to focus on the negative at this point. The short version: This service is not the service I thought it was when I first joined. We are not led and managed as I thought we would be; we treat our people badly, and then don't even reward them adequately for the work they do and the risks they take.
Looking back, I have had years in a row where I dreaded going to work rather than looking forward to it; I haven't had fun doing my job in a long time. My current assignment here at Holloman has been the best of my career; this should not necessarily be construed as high praise for Holloman or the quality of life here, but it does beat my time in the Herc and operational RPA flying. From here, I don't see any options available to me that would be better, or even on par with this assignment; all the things in the service that still interest me are either unavailable, or I would have to fight tooth and nail for years just for a chance at them, and I no longer have enough energy for that given what it would cost me.

Finally, while all of the above is true, and more than sufficient on its own, there is also this: There is more to life than effective and efficient flight operations, and I'd really like to experience some of these things, like being near my family, or having some predictability and control over my own day/week/month/year. It has become apparent to me I won't have an opportunity to do this if I stay in, and this has made the decision incredibly easy to make.

It has been an honor and a privilege serving with you all. Of all the things I disliked about my time in, I have never regretted taking on all the world's problems when I had teammates like you to do it with. I know I'm going to miss that on the outside. I miss it already. But not enough to stay.

I wish all of you the best, whatever the future holds for you. It's a small world, and we're bound to cross paths again. I've tried to send this letter to everyone I thought would care, but please feel free to forward on as you see fit. The link to my page below will continue to have current contact information after I'm out, and I've included my phone and email as well. This isn't an end, just a transition, and I look forward to talking with all of you from the other side.

Sincerely and respectfully,
Dave

(Link to my intellipedia page.)

20 August 2011

Veterans

Just read an article by Joe Klein, "The New Greatest Generation," good
stuff.

If you want to know about the good things in the US military, this is a
great place to start.

Some quotes:

'"The toughest part of leadership is telling people they have to do
something that involves pain," says Eric Greitens, a former Navy SEAL...'
'The inevitable military acronym for the five-paragraph memo is SMESC, and
the mnemonic device is "Sergeant major eats sugar cookies." Situation:
What's the problem? Mission: What's our strategy for solving it? Execution:
What tactics are we going to use? Support: What are the logistics; how many
troops and what sort of equipment will we need? Command: What other
organizations (air strikes, aerial reconnaissance, Afghan security forces)
will have to be involved?'

(I just read about this in ACSC; this is the same format used in CONPLANs
and OPLANs, that is to say, formal war planning documents.)

'They feel closer to one another than they do to either political
party...most of my friends feel politically homeless...neither party
reflected the combination of service and get-it-done pragmatism most
veterans value.'

'I once asked Moore whether the skills he learned in the Army had any
influence on his life as a civilian. "Absolutely! On every big decision I
make," he said and began to tell me about his tour as a counterintelligence
officer in a difficult section of eastern Afghanistan. "People have the
wrong impression of the military," he said. "It is extremely
entrepreneurial. I had more freedom to make decisions there than I do at
Citibank. My commander would tell me what needed to be done, and then it was
up to me to figure out how to do it." '

'There is a basic altruism. Gallina intuitively expanded the notion that you
don't leave a fallen comrade in the field to include the veterans of other
wars; from there, it's a short jump to including civilians as members of
their community too. Veterans are trained to believe that everyone in their
unit rises and falls together. "In the military, it's never about you,"
Lewis told me. "It's always about something larger." '

'"I was looking for something to fill the void. It was like losing your
family." Then McNulty invited him to join an Alabama tornado-relief crew. "I
rented a chainsaw, and within 20 minutes it felt like I was back in the
service again. We shared a common language and knew how to organize
ourselves to work efficiently... '

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2089337,00.html

Tags: links, leadership, war, history, pers, psychology, politics

18 November 2010

Sal Guinta

This still won't be a full entry, but there is a very timely quote that I heard today.

I saw SSgt Sal Guinta interviewed today, and he said that he didn't really feel the Medal of Honor was appropriate for him, or perhaps that what he had done wasn't necessarily all that exceptional.  When asked why, he said, "It's not about me...in all the times I've been in combat in Afghanistan, I've never been alone, I've never been shot at alone, I've never been left alone, since I've been in the Army."  He went on to note that he was part of team, and that the team accomplishments were more relevant.

In the Air Force, it has been the same for me.  This is the single largest thing that I could critique about the movie the Hurt Locker; so often the characters, or the small team, seems isolated, and alone.  They frequently separate, and almost never talk to the units or the people around them.  This is not the American way of war...you are never alone.  If you are, something is very very wrong.

As well, I deeply admire his honesty and humility.  Another quote that I found after searching his name, this one is even more eloquent: ."I did what I did because in the scheme of painting the picture of that ambush, that was just my brush stroke. That’s not above and beyond. I didn’t take the biggest brush stroke, and it wasn’t the most important brush stroke."



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvatore_Giunta

http://iloaktree.blogspot.com/2010/06/hurt-locker.html

29 March 2010

Holly Graf

Once again, I don't have time to give the subject it's full due, but it sounds to me like Holly Graf was a terrible leader and she got what she deserved, if the Time article is reasonably accurate. Note as well how her leadership has discouraged younger people from serving...I've seen the same thing happen in the Air Force.

My favorite quote: "I don't have time to train junior officers..." Wrong. Unless it's interfering with the hour to hour running of the ship, training junior officers is you most important duty.

Link

07 November 2008

Thanksgiving

I won't be home for Thanksgiving this year, and that's annoying for the following reason (besides the obvious): I had a really good thing to be thankful for this year.

Last year, I was thankful for the Internet. That isn't sarcasm, and it isn't meant to be shallow either. I didn't have something specific in mind when we started talking about our things to be grateful for, but I started on the fact that I was able to stay in touch with friends and family throughout all my travels, and that the Internet was a big part of that.

This year, I am grateful for the fact that the presidential race was not as bloody (metaphorically) as it could have been. Since really becoming aware of politics in college, it has seemed as though the level of discourse in the nation has dropped off, and that the most radical elements of both parties were gaining hold, increasingly creating a rift between groups of citizens (and often doing so over incredibly small issues, things that are beginning to affect smaller and smaller parts of the population, that are taking precedence over much larger issues).

In a time of such divisiveness, it would be easy to unleash the hounds, and really play to the baser human instincts, but this didn't happen. Both candidates fought for what they thought was right, and did so without true viciousness, and I truly feel that the way they both chose to campaign has bettered the country. I had conversation via email with a friend recently regarding the candidates, and I said of McCain, "There are few people in Washington I have as much respect for as John McCain; he has sacrificed more than most people can imagine. I think his true colors have shown lately in his rallies where he has been defending Obama to McCain supporters..."

John McCain had to pause in the middle of a rally, and tell to his own supporters, people (right or wrong) full of anger and fear, that they had no need to be fearful of or angry at Barack Obama.
This was a terrible political move. But it was the correct moral thing to do, and truly was good for our country, and I again reaffirm my respect for McCain's character and leadership. Sadly, his choice will be seen by lesser men both as weakness and as a failed political choice. No one remembers Cincinnatus or Scipio Africanus, but it was men such as these who made Rome great, in their willingness to set aside their own power for the benefit of the nation.

So I am thankful for John McCain and Barack Obama, and the choices they made. It is easy to find politics gone badly wrong. Look to Zimbabwe, or Myanmar, where the "bloody" is not metaphoric. Or try this one out for a change, for myself and others my age: ask your parents about American politics in the 1960s and 70s. They were there, and it was much worse in America then than now. I think of the way I have felt watching our government in action over the last several years, and I think I have only a small inkling of what it was like in the 60s, and none whatsoever of things like Myanmar, and I am thankful.

07 October 2008

Air Force

I heard a rumor recently that next year AMC will only be able to man 5% of required pilot staff jobs. I guess we shouldn't have been paying people to quit (the VSP program) for two years.

24 September 2008

Blood from a stone

We recently increased our workdays here due to the massive increase in ops tempo we (the UAV world) have gone through. I'm afraid our leadership is going to learn the wrong lesson from this, the wrong lesson being, "They're UAVs, every time we push them harder, we get more back."
This would lead them to believe that they can just keep pushing and just keep getting more back. I watched same thing happen in the desert: They asked for massive increase in ops and got it, then they asked for more, until finally we were all flying 12 hour days praying no one went DNIF or crashed one because it would mean a reduction in ops.

We already don't have any training lines, which is already bad enough. For those with no AF flying experience, most of the flying (60%? 75%?) a squadron does is training, even during a war. In the UAV world, the operational squadrons have zero dedicated training flights in a given day.

The following are a couple of articles referenced in an email from a friend who asked me about it.

Article 2, Air Force Times

-----Original Message-----
From: David Witt
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 15:43
To: X
Subject: FW: Fly opportunity


Yeah, we got a slightly early heads up on this. Big picture, I have no problem with lower level experience folks showing up here.

Small picture, what this means is that they OUGHT to get a lot more training than I got...but they probably won't, which means the already low average level of our experience will get even lower, and we will see a lot sloppier ops. This is your typical AF knee jerk reactions, all about quantity, quality goes straight out the window.

How's things?

-----Original Message-----
From: X
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 1:14 AM
To: Witt, David
Subject: FW: Fly opportunity

Interesting... not that I'd want to fly (or rather: to be responsible for that much $$ with my Murphy's law luck), but some dad's just won't let their dreams die. But it made me think - what are your thought on this, since you've seen two of the three sides first hand? Forgive me if you've addressed this in your blog, its been a few days since I've taken a peak.

-X

~~~
Up and Away: The Air Fo rce envisions building a force of 1,100 unmanned aircraft operators-up from today's pool of about 450-by Fiscal 2012 to support 50 continuous MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper combat air patrols under two new initiatives announced Tuesday at AFA's Air & Space Conference. The initiatives will develop a new cadre of UAV operators that do not have experience operating other combat aircraft, and in some cases, have no real previous flying experience at all, service officials said. "This will certainly be a cultural change," Brig. Gen. Lyn Sherlock , director of air operations on the Air Staff, told reporters during a press briefing.
Previously, the service has drawn its UAV operators from the ranks of more experienced pilots. But with the insatiable demand for UAVs, not only for overhead surveillance, but also for strike and additional roles, the Air Force is taking this new approach. Under the first initiative, the Air Force will select about 10 percent of its next batch of graduates from undergraduate pilot training in October-about 100 airmen-for training in UAV operations at Creech AFB, Nev. The second, more radical concept entails creating a new career field for UAV operators by choosing active-duty officers from various technical and non-technical backgrounds to teach to teach them to fly the UAVs. These officers will get some introductory flight training at Pueblo, Colo, and then go straight into Predator training "to bring them up to fully qualified mission status," said Brig. Gen. Darrell Jones , director of force management policy on the Air Staff. To see if this idea has long-term legs, there will be a two-part "beta test" program, he said. An initial class of 10 officers will start training in January until next fall. A second class of 10 will start next summer and finish before the end of 2009, Sherlock said. If those two test runs prove successful, the Air Force would then start accepting larger classes, Jones said.

~
published 8oct08