Showing posts with label letters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label letters. Show all posts

10 November 2010

TBI

Got the following email several months back, finally posting it...and it happens to be timely for Veteran's Day.
~~~

-----Original Message-----
From: Travers, Chelsea [mailto:Ctravers@caremeridian.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 06:59
To: davewitt
Subject: RE: Question/Website

Hi David,

Thank you for getting back to me. I have gone ahead and attached the article to this email, it contains a few reference links. If you do decide to use the article do you think you could do me a favor and send me an email letting me know that the article is up? I would really appreciate it.

Thank you again for your help and support!

Take Care,

Chelsea


-----Original Message-----
From: David Witt
Sent: Wed 4/21/2010 9:10 PM
To: Travers, Chelsea
Subject: RE: Question/Website

Chelsea,

Sure, please send me the article.

d

  _____ 

From: Travers, Chelsea [mailto:Ctravers@caremeridian.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 14:38
To: davewitt
Subject: Question/Website

Hi,

My name is Chelsea.  I am contacting you on behalf of CareMeridian
(caremeridian.com). CareMeridian is a well known subacute and skilled
nursing/rehabilitation facility located throughout the Western United States
for patients suffering from traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, or
medical complexities such as neuromuscular or congenital anomalies.  Brain
injuries are becoming all too commonly associated with modern warfare.  Many
veterans return home with brain injuries without knowing they are suffering
from them. Members of the US Department of Veterans Affairs have even coined
brain injuries as the "signature wound" of the War on Terror. To raise
awareness I was hoping that I could offer you an original article about TBI
as it relates to warfare, that you could post on your website
(iloaktree.blogspot.com).

Please let me know if this is something you'd be interested in.  If you have
any questions please do not hesitate to contact me directly at this email
address.

Best regards,

Chelsea Travers
ctravers@caremeridian.com
~~~



Traumatic Brain Injuries and the Military

Military men and women are continually involved situations where risk of injury is high. One silent war wound that can often go unnoticed is a traumatic brain injury (TBI) . A TBI damages the brain that can often cause life-altering wounds, which can result in changes in personality, behavior, and even the brain functions of the victim. Some of these conditions are not just life-altering, but can be life threatening and are often partnered with rehabilitation from special care facilities like CareMeridian Las Vegas nursing home.

According to the Veterans Health Initiative, active male members of the military were hospitalized due to TBI related injuries at a rate of 231 per 100,000. The rate for female members of the military was 150 per 100,000. Based on these statistics over 4,000 military personnel are hospitalized on average each year for traumatic brain injuries. Some are as mild as a concussion, while others can be severe and have life altering effects.

The best way to prevent TBI is through awareness. Recognizing and responding to the symptoms of a TBI can often aid in the preventing further damage caused by the injury. Dizziness, headaches, changes in personality or sleep patterns, and memory loss are clear signs of TBI. Unfortunately these symptoms can sometimes be ignored or discarded as minor pains during times of conflict and even once the solider returns home. This sets up a dangerous precedent for a war wound that may never heal, so it is vital that serviceman and their families are aware of TBI, so that they can recognize and help treat it if symptoms are present.

06 October 2009

I wish I could do anything as well as this guy rides a bike...

My reply to a recent email:

~~~
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1137883380?bctid=21337502001

I love this stuff, I can watch it for hours. When I can, I like to watch the X Games, which features a bunch of events besides BMX, which is what this is called.

(On a side note, I've been watching the X Games since ~2000, and in the last few years they've been getting a lot more TV coverage. As a result, it seems, the events have changed a bit to get bigger and bigger jumps, more speed, more height above ground, etc.; in a word, more attention-getting. But I think they are missing out...it's the small moves that he makes in this video that are so spectacular, where he's balancing the whole weight of the bike on one small patch of tire or stopping the bike on one wheel and doing almost static jumps from one surface to the next (or for that matter, backflipping off a tree!...never gets more than 10 feet off the ground, but how cool)...maybe just personal taste, I suppose, but that's me. Thanks for the link!)

d

http://espn.go.com/action/xgames/xg15/index

07 November 2008

Thanksgiving

I won't be home for Thanksgiving this year, and that's annoying for the following reason (besides the obvious): I had a really good thing to be thankful for this year.

Last year, I was thankful for the Internet. That isn't sarcasm, and it isn't meant to be shallow either. I didn't have something specific in mind when we started talking about our things to be grateful for, but I started on the fact that I was able to stay in touch with friends and family throughout all my travels, and that the Internet was a big part of that.

This year, I am grateful for the fact that the presidential race was not as bloody (metaphorically) as it could have been. Since really becoming aware of politics in college, it has seemed as though the level of discourse in the nation has dropped off, and that the most radical elements of both parties were gaining hold, increasingly creating a rift between groups of citizens (and often doing so over incredibly small issues, things that are beginning to affect smaller and smaller parts of the population, that are taking precedence over much larger issues).

In a time of such divisiveness, it would be easy to unleash the hounds, and really play to the baser human instincts, but this didn't happen. Both candidates fought for what they thought was right, and did so without true viciousness, and I truly feel that the way they both chose to campaign has bettered the country. I had conversation via email with a friend recently regarding the candidates, and I said of McCain, "There are few people in Washington I have as much respect for as John McCain; he has sacrificed more than most people can imagine. I think his true colors have shown lately in his rallies where he has been defending Obama to McCain supporters..."

John McCain had to pause in the middle of a rally, and tell to his own supporters, people (right or wrong) full of anger and fear, that they had no need to be fearful of or angry at Barack Obama.
This was a terrible political move. But it was the correct moral thing to do, and truly was good for our country, and I again reaffirm my respect for McCain's character and leadership. Sadly, his choice will be seen by lesser men both as weakness and as a failed political choice. No one remembers Cincinnatus or Scipio Africanus, but it was men such as these who made Rome great, in their willingness to set aside their own power for the benefit of the nation.

So I am thankful for John McCain and Barack Obama, and the choices they made. It is easy to find politics gone badly wrong. Look to Zimbabwe, or Myanmar, where the "bloody" is not metaphoric. Or try this one out for a change, for myself and others my age: ask your parents about American politics in the 1960s and 70s. They were there, and it was much worse in America then than now. I think of the way I have felt watching our government in action over the last several years, and I think I have only a small inkling of what it was like in the 60s, and none whatsoever of things like Myanmar, and I am thankful.

24 September 2008

Blood from a stone

We recently increased our workdays here due to the massive increase in ops tempo we (the UAV world) have gone through. I'm afraid our leadership is going to learn the wrong lesson from this, the wrong lesson being, "They're UAVs, every time we push them harder, we get more back."
This would lead them to believe that they can just keep pushing and just keep getting more back. I watched same thing happen in the desert: They asked for massive increase in ops and got it, then they asked for more, until finally we were all flying 12 hour days praying no one went DNIF or crashed one because it would mean a reduction in ops.

We already don't have any training lines, which is already bad enough. For those with no AF flying experience, most of the flying (60%? 75%?) a squadron does is training, even during a war. In the UAV world, the operational squadrons have zero dedicated training flights in a given day.

The following are a couple of articles referenced in an email from a friend who asked me about it.

Article 2, Air Force Times

-----Original Message-----
From: David Witt
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 15:43
To: X
Subject: FW: Fly opportunity


Yeah, we got a slightly early heads up on this. Big picture, I have no problem with lower level experience folks showing up here.

Small picture, what this means is that they OUGHT to get a lot more training than I got...but they probably won't, which means the already low average level of our experience will get even lower, and we will see a lot sloppier ops. This is your typical AF knee jerk reactions, all about quantity, quality goes straight out the window.

How's things?

-----Original Message-----
From: X
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 1:14 AM
To: Witt, David
Subject: FW: Fly opportunity

Interesting... not that I'd want to fly (or rather: to be responsible for that much $$ with my Murphy's law luck), but some dad's just won't let their dreams die. But it made me think - what are your thought on this, since you've seen two of the three sides first hand? Forgive me if you've addressed this in your blog, its been a few days since I've taken a peak.

-X

~~~
Up and Away: The Air Fo rce envisions building a force of 1,100 unmanned aircraft operators-up from today's pool of about 450-by Fiscal 2012 to support 50 continuous MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper combat air patrols under two new initiatives announced Tuesday at AFA's Air & Space Conference. The initiatives will develop a new cadre of UAV operators that do not have experience operating other combat aircraft, and in some cases, have no real previous flying experience at all, service officials said. "This will certainly be a cultural change," Brig. Gen. Lyn Sherlock , director of air operations on the Air Staff, told reporters during a press briefing.
Previously, the service has drawn its UAV operators from the ranks of more experienced pilots. But with the insatiable demand for UAVs, not only for overhead surveillance, but also for strike and additional roles, the Air Force is taking this new approach. Under the first initiative, the Air Force will select about 10 percent of its next batch of graduates from undergraduate pilot training in October-about 100 airmen-for training in UAV operations at Creech AFB, Nev. The second, more radical concept entails creating a new career field for UAV operators by choosing active-duty officers from various technical and non-technical backgrounds to teach to teach them to fly the UAVs. These officers will get some introductory flight training at Pueblo, Colo, and then go straight into Predator training "to bring them up to fully qualified mission status," said Brig. Gen. Darrell Jones , director of force management policy on the Air Staff. To see if this idea has long-term legs, there will be a two-part "beta test" program, he said. An initial class of 10 officers will start training in January until next fall. A second class of 10 will start next summer and finish before the end of 2009, Sherlock said. If those two test runs prove successful, the Air Force would then start accepting larger classes, Jones said.

~
published 8oct08

23 August 2008

AF notes updated


A comment from someone in the know on my previous post, reposted here so it gets as much attention.

Dirndl said...

Sorry to say you have some incorrect information.

DTs meet at least twice a year, and they give guidance (i.e. vectors) to the assignment teams--or in the case of school, to the Developmental Education Designation Board (see http://ask.afpc.randolph.af.mil/docs/dpa/developed/6025_2008DRAFTIDESDECONOPS.doc). In each case, the DT makes a recommendation based on the officer's record, timing, and applicable endorsements; they do not get involved in the nitty-gritty of matching the officer's desires to the needs of the AF.

The 2008 summer DTs and later the 08 DEDB will send members to school in AY 09/10 from year groups 96-98 (who met boards in 04-06 and have DOR 1 Mar 06 to present) (see http://ask.afpc.randolph.af.mil/docs/dpa/developed/6025_Eligibility.xls).

Your promotion board (Maj LAF (P0408C)) meets in Dec 08 (see http://ask.afpc.randolph.af.mil/main_content.asp?prods1=1&prods2=2&prods3=10&prods4=475&prods5=480). Assuming you are selected for promotion, you will first be considered for IDE in 2010 for AY11/12.

But yes, always keep your ADP up to date, because the assignment teams may use those for out-of-cycle or oddball jobs that still have to be filled.

My original post
On Intelink

28 May 2008

Humor

I highly recommend today's XKCD, gave me a great laugh!

XKCD

02 May 2008

FW: more on Gates speech

tags: email, history, air force, letters

-----Original Message-----
From: Witt David R Capt 46 ERS/OPS
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 2:34 AM
To: 46 ERS OPS ALL
Cc: X A1C 46 ERS/OPS
Subject: more on Gates speech

All,
Sorry to beat the dead horse, but if you are interested, here's
link to the full text of Mr. Gates' speech at Maxwell.

d

http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=1231

V/R,
Capt David Witt
46ERS DO

On shift 2100-0900z daily
DSN 318-443-6454/6456/7190/6209
VOSIP 308-443-8300/8303
NIPR: david.witt@X.af.mil
SIPR: david.witt@X.af.smil.mil
SIPR: predator.ops@X.af.smil.mil (mass account)
SIPR Blog: http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/blogs/david_witt/

30 April 2008

RE: SecDef Gates Did NOT rip the AF at Maxwell Today

An interesting first person perspective on the recent comments by SecDef Gates.

tags: opsec, disclaimer, air force, history, letters

-----Original Message-----
From: X Maj 46 ERS/CC
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 4:18 PM
To: 46 ERS OPS ALL
Cc: X Maj 332 AEW/PA
Subject: FW: SecDef Gates Did NOT rip the AF at Maxwell Today

All,

Here's some clarification from someone who was actually there. We can't always believe what we hear in the media.

-X
________________________________
From: X USAF AETC ACSC/AY08 STUDENT [mailto:X.X@MAXWELL.AF.MIL]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 18:55
To: X USAF AFSOC 3 SOS/CC; X USAF ACC 432 WG/CC; X J6C/J6CS; X USAF ACC 432 OG/CC; X A3/5/AFCSO; X USAF ACC 17 RS/CC
Subject: SecDef Gates Did NOT rip the AF at Maxwell Today

******Click Bar at top of email and switch to DISPLAY AS HTML*********

Sirs,

Did you hear the news today that said "AF Gets Scolding Over War Effort (CNN)" or "Gates says AF Not Doing Enough In Iraq (Associated Press)"?

In case you were wondering . . . that is NOT WHAT HAPPENED.

I was in the room (with about 1000 friends)--and I was awake-- no one left the briefing thinking that the SecDef was upset with the AF.

He did say a few things like:

- The AF did not want UAVs in 1992

- "We can do more" . . . but he said it very casually like we can always do more

- He very very briefly mentioned that he has been working on getting more UAVs/ISR . . . but this was a very small point in his entire brief

- Mainly he challenged us to think outside the box (like Col Boyd w/ the OODA loop)

The CNN article is completely out of context. His brief was very positive, uplifting, and even motivational.

Two theories racing through the school:

-- possibly he pre-released his negative speech and then changed his mind at the last minute

-- or CNN pre-wrote this speech waiting for him to say something close enough to trigger this negative article about the USAF

Sec Gates' theme was to challenge Air Univ (and the students) to think of smarter ways to deal with future conflicts-not to reprimand the AF.

This is an accurate story of what he talked about from the SecDef Website.

This picture was taken from the brief this morning and is indicative of the tone of the brief (in the background is Lt Gen Lorenz - AU CC). It does not look like he is reprimanding the AF to me . . . and he didn't.

"Now you know, and knowing is half the battle"
-- G.I. Joe, A Real American Hero

v/r

X

[minor edit after post to integrate links, erase carriage returns, add tags.]

11 April 2008

reindeer, april fools

Some interesting excerpts from a running series of letters with Sharon:

Her:
I really like your new haircut! You look nice in a military style haircut. I used to get my hair cut on base but stopped going.

So tell me a story about your military experiences. Do you ever go crazy being around so many men?

~
I bought some reindeer from him and they pull me to class because there is so much snow and ice that I don't want to drive in the coldest months.

I have a fun idea. Since it is April 1st tomorrow why don't we change our relationship status on fb and pretend we are dating for one week as a joke? Todd will be so baffled, especially because we live so far apart. :) If he asks I can say that I am now pregnant as well. :)

Me:
I'm game on the prank, status changed my end. I'll change it back on 7 Apr. Yes, do tell him the pregnant part, the distance factor will boost my already considerable reputation for virility .

~
Hmmm, military experiences. I don't know about "go" crazy, we pretty much "are" crazy about women. I am working on a blog entry about it, but sometimes the best part of my whole day is hearing a woman's voice on the radio.

I had a female pilot friend deployed with me at one point. She was taxiing out one day and making a radio call to tower and in the background as the tower controller was talking to her you could hear someone in the background with a Russian accent say, "I love you!"
(We were in Kyrgystan, a former Soviet Republic, so the Russian accent made sense.)

For a genuinely crazy story, try this one out. I had never heard of this before getting here, but apparently there is a serious problem with male-male rape in the US army over here. Not that surprising when you compare this place to prison, bunch of dudes all crammed together for 15 months, isolated from the rest of the world they knew, with the added pressure of being shot at quite often.

Her:
Todd has now changed his status update-look at the one before.

Please don't tell anyone we both know that this is a joke until a week from now. ...for one, is sure to be surprised if he notices.

So are you also being shot at all the time? :( I wouldn't be able to sleep if that was me.

~
Just to keep you updated this was the message I just sent Todd:

Yep, Dave and I have kept our illicit relations a secret for a while. We don't see each other very often and sometimes we can't talk that regularly because of his schedule and the time zone differences. So we tried being friends but we are just too attracted to each other when we meet up. The pregnancy wasn't planned...I am normally very careful about these things...it was one of those I drank too much New Years surprises. I always wanted to be married first...oh well. We are talking about setting a date soon.

~
Oh my gosh! My doctor friend just cooked up this ultrasound picture with our twins! Completely wild! It even has my name on it. I even fooled a bunch of other people without meaning to.

In case you are wondering, I haven't lost my marbles. But I think we have taken April Fools to another level!

~
I find the thought of you being shot at quite upsetting and I find it hard to believe that you get used to it. But I will try to believe you...

Me:
It's interesting that you say that about getting shot at. There's a Chili's down the street from my house that I eat at a lot, so I've gotten to know a few of the waitresses. I was walking out a couple days before I left and I mentioned it would probably be awhile before I saw her again because I was going to Iraq, and I think I ruined her day. She got all sad looking...I felt bad, but I was really surprised because we didn't even know each other that well.

Well, you do get used to it. Most of the time I sleep through it now.

Her:
Sure, I will send you a postcard. It might have to wait until after final exams in May though. What is your address? Will you send me a postcard too? I have never gotten one from that part of the world.

My undergrad degree was in Psych and I learned how there is a stronger connection between couples who meet when they are young. The divorce rate goes up by 20-30% I think if you marry a person you meet after you are 25. I read about this a long time ago so my figures might be off. There is some kind of connection that forms when people are young which cannot be replicated later in life.

Me:
Interesting info on relationships. I was considering doing psych for my masters. I wonder if the reason for that is physiological (i.e., the brain is younger so the connections are more enduring), or learned (i.e., when you are older, you've met more people so each relationship is less unique.)

Her:
About your hypothesizing-the first reason is correct.

Jeez, your address looks like it is on the moon or something. There isn't even a country!

And when we call it quits don't try any funny stuff. :) You only get one kid and half the reindeer.






21 March 2008

IDF; pilot advice

Just sitting here about to start writing when the Big Voice came on:

"This is the Command Post. There has been an indirect fire attack. All personnel are released. All personnel are to remain vigilant for UXOs. All clear, all clear, all clear. I say again, this is the Command Post...."

My cousin is in IFS in Colorado and has asked me a few questions on flying via Facebook. The letter is somewhat interesting, maybe even to non-pilots, and I don't have anything else to write about today, so here it is.

~~~
4:19pm Mar 19th
Good stuff, well tell the Major I said hey. Got to fly yesterday, went pretty well. We did some ground reference maneuvers (S Turns/ Turns around a Point). Going up again today in two hours for a lot of the same. Should be a good time. They tell us we're ten days behind schedule and that as soon as the super senior class gets out its game time. I believe the words my flight commander used were, "Get ready for the suck... its gonna hurt." Basically they're double turning us up the ass to try and make up for lost time. Yay... at least it means less time in the Dirty P.

Any advice on mastering trimming or pitch picture?

~~~
2:48pm Mar 20th
Ha...yes, welcome to the suck indeed. Every training training program you go through with the Air Force will be just as rushed.

First let me say that piloting advice is very individual. I might say something that works perfectly for you, or it might be totally useless - this was one of the hardest things for me learning to fly. Sometimes, for no obvious reason, a certain instructor just can't teach things to me very well.

Okay, trimming. The trick with trim for me was that it was hard enough for me just to know what normal control movements were. Adding another movement on top of that would suck my concentration. And then I would forget I had trim in and have to fight it in some other phase of flight. So, here's what I did, may or may not be good advice and or work for you: I would just fly by hand, and only when I noticed how much pressure I was holding would I trim. And I wouldn't use a ton, or try to fine tune it, just a couple of clicks. (Your trim button/switch does click, doesn't it?)

Or, one other thing you can do is just plan a few clicks here and there,
i.e., when rolling wings level in the pattern in the Tweet after initial climbout (as I recall), I knew three clicks of nosedown was about right, and then I didn't think about it again for awhile. So just find the points in the flight where you have a lot of control pressure (nose down on final, nose up on t/o, etc.) and come up with a preprogrammed trim movement
(i.e. one click, 3 clicks, etc.)

(This is a really funny conversation considering trim in the MQ-1, but I'll save that convo for another time...the MQ-1, of course, as in so many ways, is completely different from normal airplanes.)

As for pitch, I assume this is on final? Pitch was even harder than trim, in terms of seeing the same thing as the IP. In fact, I'm not even going to try to describe a pitch picture in text. Let me just give a technique for final that I didn't really start using religiously until after pilot training. I assume you won't be doing any instrument flying there, but that is where a first learned this. I would give myself a PAR, which is to say, I would call out everything I was looking at, something like, "I am on airspeed, high, on centerline, now hot - pulling some power, on altitude, on centerline, on airspeed, low - adding some power, slightly right of centerline - coming left..." etc., all the way to the flare. This has a couple of advantages: the first was that because I was verbalizing it, it improved the speed of my crosscheck which improved my flying, and second, because I was verbalizing it, the IP knew what I was looking at and his/her feedback was much more focused, i.e., "you caught the sink, but you got into the sink because you pulled power too early," etc.

Incidentally, who are the instructors of this program? Active AF? Civ?
Also, how long is your commitment for your wings?

~~~
5:03pm Mar 20th
Ok, here goes:

I consistently adjust pitch and trim before power... which is obviously wrong. I'm going up today and I'll try flying first (pitch/power) then trimming as you suggested. The trim button doesn't click but there's a series of lights on the instrument panel that shows the setting.

My pitch on final is horrendous. Part of my problem is on my base turns I was making 30-40 degree banks and rolling out way early and inside the runway. Then it becomes an aileron/rudder struggle. Throw a bit of wind in there and forget it... I'm doing a go around. Yesterday was a good correction day for that... we did 6 touch and goes so I think I've got a better idea of what to do. I'm still flaring a bit too early... those numbers just get so damn big... :)

I have been talking through things lately and it's help tremendously, especially on checklist items. The tendency is to rush and then forget a step and that's never good for business (or check rides). Talking has kept me "honest".

The IPs here are mostly civilian. The AF contracted the training out to Doss Aviation:

http://www.dossaviation.com/

But with that, there are a number of active duty officers here. They serve as our "Military Training Officers" and some of the upper staff. They'll fly with us on occasion but typically just on check rides. A lot of the civilian IPs are prior military... many retired 04s - 06s. Good instructors over all.

The commitment for pilots is the same as its been: 10 years after you pin your wings on. As you know, I'm getting paid as a 2 lou right now but it doesn't count towards that contract. A reality I know you faced coming out of the zoo. But hey, if I wanted fair I wouldn't have taken a commission... ;)
~~~

3:49 PM, 21 Mar 08

Yes, don't trim before you know what normal control pressures are at a given attitude.

Wow, no click in the trim button, that would mess with me.

Another technique for learning pitch/power/trim is to get the plane relatively stable and then relax your hands a lot. The airplane will show you what it's natural tendency is. This is what you trim out. When you get good, you can remove you hands entirely and the plane should most stay on airspeed/altitude/heading.
Obviously you can't do this in a critical phase of flight like short final, turn to final, etc.

Overcontrolling (e.g., 30-40 degs on turn to final) is my natural tendency, so it's something I had to fight against, or you become you own worst enemy (e.g., you turn late, so you bank a lot, but then you turn too fast and roll out inside final, have to turn back and dump the nose because now you're too high, etc...one large correction leading to another large correction, all the way around.) You will get over the worst of it early on in the flying.

The verbalizing trick became a lot more useful in a crew airplane, because it keeps your crew on the same page (literally, in the case of checklists). Your co-pilot would know you were addressing sink, your nav would know you were addressing heading/centerline, your engineer would know you were addressing the fact that the engines were NTSing, etc. One of the single best pieces of advice I ever got from an instructor was this: "Any time someone talks to you in the airplane, say something back." If you don't say something to acknowledge it, they don't know if you heard them, if there's another problem, if you were listening to a radio call, if you are asleep/dead, etc., especially if they can't see you, as for a loadmaster in the back.

more questions? Send 'em.
~~~

That's the end of the letters, here's the oddity of the MQ-1:

Most airplanes trim to an airspeed, i.e., you set the trim nose level and the airplane should mostly stay in level flight at the same airspeed, assuming you don't touch the power. If you pull power off, the plane will pitch nose lower (that is, descend) to maintain the same airspeed. If you add power, the plane will pitch up (climb), still trying to maintain airspeed. But in the MQ-1, because of the number of computers between you and the airplane, you trim to an attitude, i.e., you set five degrees nose up and the airplane will fly it. The nose up attitude will start a climb, but if you don't have enough power set, you will run out of airspeed. Opposite problem with nose down trim (too much airspeed if you've got the wrong power).